1. Who's Who Online® is planning to provide an online mechanism to allow visitors to our site to nominate individuals of accomplishment to be profiled in Who's Who Online®. What do you think of this idea, on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being most favorable?

2. Do you think that anyone you know should be profiled in Who's Who Online®?

3. Do you think that individuals should be allowed to nominate themselves?

4. Who's Who Online® anticipates that those profiled in Who's Who Online® may be younger and perhaps less "famous" than those profiled in traditional "Who's Who" publications (we do not expect many CEOs of multinational corporations or Supreme Court Justices!) In your opinion, on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the highest and strictest standards, how stringent should the standards be for those nominated by others for inclusion in Who's Who Online®?

5. Similarly, if self-nominations are allowed, and again on a scale of 1-10, with 10 being the highest and strictest standards, how stringent should the standards be for those nominating themselves for inclusion in Who's Who Online®?

6. How would you feel, personally, if a business associate, client or colleague nominated you for inclusion in Who's Who Online®?

7. If you were nominating a business associate, client or colleague for inclusion in Who's Who Online® would you tend to nominate based strictly on merit?

8. If we do take online nominations, do you feel that the online community (excluding yourself) would nominate others for inclusion in Who's Who Online® based strictly on merit?

9. If a provider of Internet/W3 related projects/assignments were profiled in Who's Who Online®, and visitors to the site were offered the capability to search by area of specialization, how likely do think it would be that such an individual would attract clients/collaborators that might benefit her/him?

10. Having viewed this prototype, how would you feel about being profiled in Who's Who Online®?

11. (Optional) Enter your name and e-mail address